Patent Depending

By Jason Steele
on April 13, 2011

Securing a patent for an invention is crucial in maintaining exclusive rights to your idea. For a physical invention like a toy or a machine part it serves to prevent a competitor from profiting from your invention or intellectual property (IP). However, patenting common software applications is more waving around a plastic rod and claiming to have invented a stick (actually patent #6360693 is exactly that). The end result is that your competitors can just move past you and find a newer, better stick while yours becomes obsolete fairly quickly...sometimes in a matter of days.

There are numerous organizations dedicated to stopping software patents including the Free Software Foundation (FSF),, and among others. They maintain that software should be free and not subject to a patent. In addition software patents discourage innovation - could a programmer's code accidentally infringe on a software patent? They clog up the US Patent Office with frivolous claims like inventing moving web pictures. And by the time most patents are granted the marketplace software technology has advanced so far making the initial "invention" ridiculously out-of-date.

One reason behind companies patenting their software is to have something to hide behind. They are depending on their patent to cover holes in their core business model rather than just competing on the basis of a superior product. It's really just a posturing PR trick, but can be used to some effect when a company drops sound bites into the marketplace implying it owns the rights to a particular software technology. It can put "concern" into the minds of customers who don't wish to be in the middle of a patent fight, even if the saber-rattling and patent in question have no leg to stand on (which is the case most of the time in today's world of evolving software IP.)

Another reason for patents is for companies whose business it is to buy up patents for the sole purpose of filing patent suits...but this is not a world most of us are concerned with.

We all agonize over defending our IP. But, for the average business software company today, it's hard to patent any unique process that you believe can be defended two years into the future in the midst of a whirlwind of change. And, it's probably a waste of time and money that could be dedicated to actually "competing".

Recent Posts

Car Shoppers Heavily Influenced by Facebook Ads
April 24th, 2014

Is Online Video Effective?
January 28th, 2014

Video 5 - Customization
November 1st, 2013

Video 5
October 9th, 2013

Xmas in July
July 22nd, 2013

Capture App
June 10th, 2013

The Tide Is Turning for Auto Dealers
April 11th, 2013

Video Production Tips
February 12th, 2013

Google Analytics Updates: Part Two
January 22nd, 2013

Alpha vs. Visible in Actionscript 3
December 10th, 2012

Big Volume and Sales, Low Costs
September 10th, 2012

How to Make Your Online
Video Ad a Smash

July 24th, 2012

DoubleClick Updates
July 16th, 2012

Google Analytics Updates
May 18th, 2012

Video Run Around
May 4th, 2012

Mobile Video Advertising: Best Practices
April 11th, 2012

Mobile Spending
March 8th, 2012

Smart Video, Smarter Customer
February 9th, 2012

Two Snaps Up!
December 20th, 2011

Banner Blinders
November 17th, 2011

Click It or Stick It
October 7th, 2011

Online Video
September 20th, 2011

SEO + Video
September 1, 2011

Not Made In China
August 19, 2011

Geo-Location Basics
August 1, 2011

Truth in Advertising
July 22, 2011

June 23, 2011

What's to "Like"
June 8, 2011

Digital Dealer Conference – Follow Up
May 12, 2011

Browser Wars
April 27, 2011

Digital Dealer Conference 2011
April 20, 2011

Patent Depending
April 13, 2011

April 06, 2011

What is the Bounce Rate and what does it mean for online video metrics?
March 11, 2011

QR Codes – the 2011 Answer to Texting?
March 01, 2011

©2012 Liquidus Marketing    Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map